Developed in conjunction with Joomla extensions.

Dr.Amir Hooshang Mirkooshesh

Taken from the article:

Analysis of Iran-Saudi Arabia Relations from the Perspective of Motivational Realism Theory (2005-2015)

Motivational realism can be considered as a branch of realism that focuses on security-seeker governments. Andrew Kidd first introduced the concept into the international relations literature in his book Trust and Distrust in International Relations. Although Randall Schweller had previously discussed the motivation of actors seeking security and greed for work, according to Glazer, Kidd's argument is stronger and depends on a set of empirical topics.

Jeffrey W. Taliaferro

Jeffrey W. Taliaferro

Does the international system provide incentives for expansion? If so, should the United States seek to guarantee its long-term security through a grand strategy of preponderance (or primacy) and pursue opportunities to weaken potential great power competitors, such as China? Alternatively, does the international system provide more disincentives than incentives for aggression? If this is the case, should the United States seek to guarantee its long-term security through a grand strategy of selective engagement? Two strands of contemporary realism provide different answers to these questions.

Stephen M. Walt

Abstract :Policy makers pay relatively little attention to the vast theoretical literature in IR, and many scholars seem uninterested in doing policy-relevant work. These tendencies are unfortunate because theory is an essential tool of statecraft. Many policy debates ultimately rest on competing theoretical visions, and relying on a false or flawed theory can lead to major foreign policy disasters.

Ian Hall

When Kenneth Waltz passed away on 12 May 2013, International Relations (IR) lost one of its finest theorists. Waltz contributed not just one, but three major works to the field – Man, the State and War (1959), Theory of International Politics (1979) and The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May be Better (1981) – as well as many that are less well known, including Foreign Policy and Democratic Politics (1967). His prodigious achievements in research were matched by those in education: at Berkeley and at Columbia, he nurtured the talents of a series of prominent scholars, including Stephen Van Evera, James Fearon, Christopher Layne, Barry Posen and Stephen Walt.[1]

John J. Mearsheimer

 In its simplest form, my theory maintains that the basic structure of the international system forces states concerned about their security to compete with each other for power. The ultimate goal of every great power is to maximize its share of world power and eventually dominate the system. In practical terms, this means that the most powerful states seek to establish hegemony in their region of the world while also ensuring that no rival great power dominates another area.

Contact Us

info[a]iirjournal.com

 

©2021 iirjournal.com. All Rights Reserved